Back Forward Stop Play

Active Topics

Q post 2653 [RBG]

User avatar
StormAnon Canada
Site Admin
Posts: 1560
Joined: Mar 6th, '18, 23:36
Location: Pioneer Freedom
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Q post 2653 [RBG]

Post by StormAnon » Jan 6th, '19, 21:37

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/4626734.html#4627556
New: Title TBD
2653
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
6 Jan 2019 - 9:32:35 AM
[RBG]
Why was she 'selected'?
Who appointed her?
Remember [her] history.
Ref: 230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Highlights:
>Called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101)
>Called for the sex-integration of Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts because they “perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.” (Page 145)
>Insisted on sex-integrating “college fraternity and sorority chapters” and replacing them with “college social societies.” (Page 169)
>Cast constitutional doubt on the legality of “Mother’s Day and Father’s Day as separate holidays.” (Page 146)
>Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)
>Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)
>Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)
>Ginsburg wrote that the Mann Act (which punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls) is “offensive.” Such acts should be considered “within the zone of privacy.” (Page 98)
>Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.” But, she added, “the need for affirmative action and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed services.” (Page 218)
>An indefatigable censor, Ginsburg listed hundreds of “sexist” words that must be eliminated from all statutes. Among words she found offensive were: man, woman, manmade, mankind, husband, wife, mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, serviceman, longshoreman, postmaster, watchman, seamanship, and “to man” (a vessel). (Pages 15-16)
>Wanted he, she, him, her, his, and hers to be dropped down the memory hole. They must be replaced by he/she, her/him, and hers/his, and federal statutes must use the bad grammar of “plural constructions to avoid third person singular pronouns.” (Page 52-53)
>Condemned the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. McRae and claimed that taxpayer-funded abortions should be a constitutional right.
http://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/senat ... -ginsburg/
Who are the doctors 'currently' treating [RBG]?
What other political [former/current] sr. political heads are they affiliated w/?
What 'off-market' drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function?
What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]?
Who is managing her care?
Who is 'really' managing her care?
The clock is ticking.
PANIC IN DC.
Q
Attachments
RBG.jpg
RBG quote.jpg
GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-2-4-3-12.pdf
(659.93 KiB) Downloaded 8 times


Image Image Image Image Image Image
User avatar
StormAnon Canada
Site Admin
Posts: 1560
Joined: Mar 6th, '18, 23:36
Location: Pioneer Freedom
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Q post 2653 [RBG]

Post by StormAnon » Jan 6th, '19, 21:43

Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Does Q's post reflect accurately what Ginsberg's positions are?
Attachments
cr12se9.pdf
(7.32 MiB) Downloaded 5 times


Image Image Image Image Image Image
User avatar
StormAnon Canada
Site Admin
Posts: 1560
Joined: Mar 6th, '18, 23:36
Location: Pioneer Freedom
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Q post 2653 [RBG]

Post by StormAnon » Jan 6th, '19, 21:50

Sirs:
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights presents this report to you pursuant to Public Law 85-315, as amended.
This report is an assessment of the status of women under Federal law. It surveys the United States Code identifying sex-based references. The report briefly discusses possible solutions and advocates action on the part of Congress and the President in ending the bias which remains in the law.
As some members of Congress are probably aware, the initial research and draft of this report was developed by contractors, Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Brenda Feigen Fasteau, assisted by a group of Columbia Law School students. That original product, utilized by several committees of the International Women1s Year (IWY) project, led to strong recommendations that a comprehensive study of our laws— statutory and regulatory—be completed and a strategy developed to end sex bias in our laws. Former President Ford, in response to IWY, directed the Department of Justice to undertake such a study. The Justice Department study is underway and should not suffer from some of the limitations of this study that we are transmitting to you. Our study is not comprehensive, but it is a guide to you and to the Justice Department for action in erasing sex-based references and sex bias from our most basic laws. This study is current through December 1977.
The report is extensive, but not exhaustive. It is anticipated that the Department of Justice will utilize its resources to elaborate on what the Commissions report surveys. Much of the substantive material is included in Parts I and III. Part II is devoted to a Title-by-Title analysis. The discussion is deliberately brief—the value of Part II is to report or identify the sex-based references in each Title of the United States Code within the limitations set out earlier in the report. Part III,
in
CR 1.2: Se9
"Findings and Recommendations," summarizes positions stated earlier in Parts I and II. Part III urges Presidential and congressional action, with strongest emphasis on congressional action.
We urge your consideration of the facts presented and ask for your leadership in ensuring implementation of the recommendations made.
Respectfully,
Arthur S. Flemming, Chairman Stephen Horn, Vice Chairman Frankie M. Freeman Manuel Ruiz, Jr. Murray Saltzman
John A. Buggs, Staff Director


Image Image Image Image Image Image
User avatar
StormAnon Canada
Site Admin
Posts: 1560
Joined: Mar 6th, '18, 23:36
Location: Pioneer Freedom
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Q post 2653 [RBG]

Post by StormAnon » Jan 7th, '19, 00:18

from page iii
Attachments
rbg.jpg


Image Image Image Image Image Image
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Q Posts with #”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest