noticing can stop what is coming

Pedophilia Crime Ring Archive

User avatar
RedpillTheWorld
Posts: 278
Joined: Mar 7th, '18, 03:08
Contact:

Roseanne's Tweet about Trump rescuing 100's of children/month from pedo's! Hmmm...tweet is missing now. Please share.

Unread post by RedpillTheWorld »

Thank you Roseanne for using your platform to draw attention to this "Conspiracy Theory".
The MSM is freaking out! How could they cover for these CREEPS?!!!
What must the Globalists have on them?? OMG.

Attachments
Roseanne tweet.PNG


Join me on Image
Image Image

User avatar
RedpillTheWorld
Posts: 278
Joined: Mar 7th, '18, 03:08
Contact:

Unread post by RedpillTheWorld »

Funny how the MSM Freak out actually DRAWS MORE ATTENTION TO THE REAL NEWS! LOL!

Attachments
Roseanne.jpeg


Join me on Image
Image Image

User avatar
RedpillTheWorld
Posts: 278
Joined: Mar 7th, '18, 03:08
Contact:

Unread post by RedpillTheWorld »

Here's the link to the spreadsheet with details & links to reports.
http://freedomforcenews.com/human-trafficking-arrests/

Attachments
PEDO ARRESTS.PNG


Join me on Image
Image Image

User avatar
RedpillTheWorld
Posts: 278
Joined: Mar 7th, '18, 03:08
Contact:

Unread post by RedpillTheWorld »

(CNN)Actress Roseanne Barr threw Twitter off the rails late Friday after she tweeted her support of a right-wing conspiracy theory.
"President Trump has freed so many children held in bondage to pimps all over this world. Hundreds each month. He has broken up trafficking rings in high places everywhere. notice that. I disagree on some things, but give him benefit of doubt-4 now," she tweeted.

Code: Select all

President Trump has freed so many children held in bondage to pimps all over this world. Hundreds each month. He has broken up trafficking rings in high places everywhere. notice that. I disagree on some things, but give him benefit of doubt-4 now.
— Roseanne Barr (@therealroseanne) March 31, 2018

The theory, known as "The Storm," is believed to have started after Trump cryptically remarked during a photo op with military leaders and their spouses before a White House dinner last October that reporters were seeing the "calm before the storm." White House press secretary Sarah Sanders declined to elaborate the next day on what the President meant.
"The Storm," as Newsweek, Mediaite and others have explained, alleges that high-profile Democrats and other famous people are involved in child sex-trafficking rings, and that Trump is breaking them up and arresting those involved in their operation. The theory has been traced to the online message board 4Chan, where an anonymous user known as "QAnon," or simply "Q," has propagated the theory.

Twitter users concerned about Barr's involvement in such theories quickly pointed to past tweets by her that would further explain her involvement in the theory. In November, Barr tweeted, "Who is Q?" The Daily Beast reported. The actress added hours later, "tell Qanon to DM me in the next 24 hours."
After her tweet Friday, many Twitter users took to the platform to proclaim their confusion, including New York Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman, who simply tweeted "What?"
Barr re-entered the spotlight this week after Trump revealed that he called to congratulate her on the highly successful reboot of the show, "Roseanne," an ABC sitcom about a blue-collar family in Illinois originally broadcast in the late 1980s and 1990s.
Barr, who is a supporter of Trump in the new series and in real life, has recently embraced several fringe conspiracy theories, according to The Daily Beast, including the one she tweeted about Friday, which is part of a larger conspiracy theory that alleges satanism and sex-trafficking by Trump's opponents.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/31/politics ... index.html



Join me on Image
Image Image

PawPaw
Posts: 14
Joined: Mar 10th, '18, 16:30
Contact:

Unread post by PawPaw »

http://www.franklinscandal.com/

The FRANKLIN SCANDAL is the story of a nationwide pedophile ring that pandered children to a cabal of the rich and powerful. The ring’s pimps were a pair of political powerbrokers who had access to the highest levels of our government. Nebraska legislators attempted to expose the network in 1989 and 1990, but the legislators' efforts were followed by a rash of mysterious deaths and the overpowering responses of federal and local law enforcement, including the FBI and Justice Department, which effected an immaculate cover-up of the trafficking network. :x

The publisher is donating 50% of the book’s proceeds to organizations that assist abused children.



User avatar
Storm
Site Admin
Posts: 1815
Joined: Mar 6th, '18, 23:36
Location: Pioneer Freedom
Contact:

Unread post by Storm »

WikiLeaks
https://wikileaks.org/Pedosta-emails/emailid/7524

RE: Follow-up Media Call

Code: Select all

			

				From:jbenenson@bsgco.com
				To: nmerrill@hrcoffice.com, robbymook2015@gmail.com
					CC: cheryl.mills@gmail.com, pir@hrcoffice.com, huma@hrcoffice.com, gruncom@aol.com, john@algpolling.com, dschwerin@hrcoffice.com

				Date: 2015-01-14 01:08
				Subject: RE: Follow-up Media Call
				
			


		

			

				We are all focused on getting diversity  and we have to get there.  But we also have a lot of big jobs to fill in the next few months and I think we have to try to slow down our process.

We have a handful of people right now and given the leaks that are occurring in the last week, I actually think we have to shut down the process now to the 1-2 essential posts that need filling soon and build the diverse team we need from there.

These stories will only matter/hurt us if we keep pushing hard and get too much chatter out there.

I think we have to settle on what roles need to be filled immediately and limit our activity to that. If we can create a "silent period" for a couple of weeks and possibly slow down the press appetite we can buy ourselves some space to fill in the team we want and need. This would starving the beast instead of feeding it.

I think as we continue to search, we have to one person assigned to each post, talking to only the people we need to talk and expand that search process when we run into a dead end. It seems clear that multiple people talking to multiple people is not a strategy for containment and containment has to be a top priority for the next six weeks I think.

We face risks with either approach but I think we have seen what happens when we're all reaching out and I don't' think that's getting us where we want.

Joel

From: Nick Merrill [mailto:nmerrill@hrcoffice.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 9:40 PM
To: Robby Mook
Cc: Cheryl Mills; Philippe Reines; Huma Abedin; Mandy Grunwald; John Anzalone; Dan Schwerin; Joel Benenson; John Pedosta; Jim Margolis
Subject: Re: Follow-up Media Call

Robby claims he's 1/16th Apache, so we should be all set.

Kidding aside, do we have any diversity we can point to at this stage?

On Jan 13, 2015, at 9:28 PM, Robby Mook <robbymook2015@gmail.com<mailto:robbymook2015@gmail.com>> wrote:
Lotta white guys.

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com<mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com>> wrote:
Nick

If we are going to share names or themes, we should strive for some diversity (beyond gender) in the line up or focus.

cdm

On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:36 PM, Nick Merrill <nmerrill@hrcoffice.com<mailto:nmerrill@hrcoffice.com>> wrote:
Here's the draft of the memo for feedback, both attached and below.

Earned Media/Next Steps
January 2015

Objective: As media attention increasingly turns to 2016 and Secretary Clinton continues to move towards a decision, we want to be proactive in shaping a public narrative that does three things:

1) Explains on our own terms who she's meeting and talking with, both in terms of potential campaign hires and policy advisors. She's casting a wide net, looking for the best talent, and listening to people with bold ideas from across the party. Notably, she is specifically reaching out to progressive policy experts and to people in the Obama orbit, demonstrating that she is doing things differently this time. She will be positioned to run a thoughtful, successful, forward-looking and technological advanced campaign, should she decide to run.

2) Provides cover and context for recruiting the best people and appealing to those who are looking for signals about whether this is something that they want to be a part of.

3) Begins to build energy and enthusiasm among Democrats for a forward-looking potential candidacy that will offer a bold vision for the future.

Placing a Story

As discussed on our call, we are all in agreement that the time is right place a story with a friendly journalist in the coming days that positions us a little more transparently while achieving the above goals.

Who:
For something like this, especially in the absence of us teasing things out to others, we feel that it's important to go with what is safe and what has worked in the past, and to a publication that will reach industry people for recruitment purposes.

We have has a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico over the last year. We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed. While we should have a larger conversation in the near future about a broader strategy for reengaging the beat press that covers HRC, for this we think we can achieve our objective and do the most shaping by going to Maggie.

What:
Mechanically, the story will have three basic components. First, a list of names that we agree upon beforehand that we will give to a reporter on background, both policy people and campaign people. Second, some information provided on background that explains what is happening and why and third, a quote on-the-record that affirms all of this in an official capacity, making clear that this is a sanctioned story.

1) Names:

a. Policy*

Code: Select all

                                          i.     Joe Stiglitz

                                        ii.     Paul Volcker
  • More names available if and when it's helpful. And we should revisit if and how to give people a heads up beforehand.

b. Campaign

Code: Select all

                                          i.     John, Joel, and Robby are already out there

                                        ii.     Teddy Goff?

                                      iii.     Wendy Clark?

2) On Background as someone familiar with HRC's thinking:

After the midterms, HRC turned in earnest to thinking through a decision, as she always said she would. She's taking on the two big questions she posed at the end of her book: "What's your vision for America?" and "Can you lead us there?" During the midterm campaign, you heard her lay out a lot of the challenges we face, particularly stagnant incomes and the middle class squeeze that is preventing a lot of Americans from feeling the recovery. So now she's focusing on potential solutions. She's casting a wide net, with a particular emphasis on new voices and new ideas. Talking to Joe Stiglitz about inequality. Talking to Paul Volker about financial reform. When you include outreach by her team, there have been discussions with more than 100 policy experts across the country. As for the second question -- can you lead us there? -- she's also talking to people about what a successful, forward-looking and technological advanced campaign would look like, one that would allow her to have a conversation with the American public about these ideas and do so in innovative ways. And just like on the policy side, she's especially interested in new voices and new talent. It's no accident she's talking to so many people from the Obama orbit. Joel Benenson, for example. If she runs, this is going to be a different kind of campaign, from top to bottom.

3) On the record:

She is thinking through a decision and doing so with a big-tent approach that allows her to hear from lots of people across the Democratic party. She wants to hear new voices and new ideas. She's using this time to look at bold new ideas for helping the middle class and what it would take to build an inclusive, thoughtful and technically advanced campaign, so that if she decides to run, she'll be ready.

When:
Next week probably makes the most sense, but after we have an agreed-upon plan in place we should reconvene early next week by email or phone and make a decision.

From: Philippe Reines <pir@hrcoffice.com<mailto:pir@hrcoffice.com>>
Date: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 8:32 PM
To: Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com<mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com>>, Robby Mook <robbymook2015@gmail.com<mailto:robbymook2015@gmail.com>>, Huma Abedin <huma@hrcoffice.com<mailto:huma@hrcoffice.com>>, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com<mailto:gruncom@aol.com>>, John Anzalone <john@algpolling.com<mailto:john@algpolling.com>>, Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hrcoffice.com<mailto:dschwerin@hrcoffice.com>>, Joel Benenson <jbenenson@bsgco.com<mailto:jbenenson@bsgco.com>>, John Pedosta <john.Pedosta@gmail.com<mailto:john.Pedosta@gmail.com>>, NSM <nmerrill@hrcoffice.com<mailto:nmerrill@hrcoffice.com>>, Jim Margolis <Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com<mailto:Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com>>
Subject: Re: Follow-up Media Call

Robby, I agree with you about the next discussion needing to be about specific implementation. Towards that end, Nick will reply all with the memo he drafted - which has languished with me, not him. I can do anytime tonight, but a 10pm call two years before Iowa seems a bit much - especially since there won't be anyone left to call us tomorrow, they all hit in one fell swoop this afternoon. So my suggestion is that everyone absorbs Nick's draft overnight, and Marissa Astor sets up a call tomorrow for tomorrow on the early side with the benefit of reading all these stories. Again though, I'm free at 10pm if the group thinks we shouldn't wait. Huma & Robby, entirely up to you.

Since I procrastinated though, I'll just add here what I was going to incorporate: Yes HRC learned from 2008, as she has learned from every experience of her life. But we shouldn't let people forget that 2007 was eight years ago. She has had many experiences since and they have been part of the learning/growing process. So the question of what she will do in 2016 isn't without a basis to answer as if she's been in a coma since she last ran. Look at what she did for President Obama in the general. Look at how she handled his wanting her to join the cabinet. Look at how she did the job of Secretary of State. Look at what she has done since, particularly on the philanthropic front. She has made hundreds of policy, management and personnel decisions over that span, and by and large they've turned out pretty well.

If you want to know what someone is going to do, a good place to start is what they've done. In 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014.

From: Robby Mook <robbymook2015@gmail.com<mailto:robbymook2015@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 8:16 PM
To: Huma Abedin <huma@hrcoffice.com<mailto:huma@hrcoffice.com>>
Cc: Mandy Grunwald <GrunCom@aol.com<mailto:GrunCom@aol.com>>, John Anzalone <john@algpolling.com<mailto:john@algpolling.com>>, Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hrcoffice.com<mailto:dschwerin@hrcoffice.com>>, Joel Benenson <jbenenson@bsgco.com<mailto:jbenenson@bsgco.com>>, John Pedosta <john.Pedosta@gmail.com<mailto:john.Pedosta@gmail.com>>, Nick Merrill <nmerrill@hrcoffice.com<mailto:nmerrill@hrcoffice.com>>, PIR <pir@hrcoffice.com<mailto:pir@hrcoffice.com>>, Jim Margolis <Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com<mailto:Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com>>
Subject: Re: Follow-up Media call

Great--I just want something to react to because we have a rough strategy--I think we're in a good spot to talk next steps now.

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Huma Abedin <huma@hrcoffice.com<mailto:huma@hrcoffice.com>> wrote:
I know PIR will weigh in shortly

From: Robby Mook [mailto:robbymook2015@gmail.com<mailto:robbymook2015@gmail.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:04 PM
To: Mandy Grunwald
Cc: Huma Abedin; John Anzalone; Dan Schwerin; Joel Benenson; John Pedosta; Nick Merrill; Philippe Reines; Jim Margolis

Subject: Re: Follow-up Media call

Also, to be clear, are we reacting to a proposed plan of action or just discussing? I would strongly prefer to react to something because we discussed strategy on our last call and at this point I would like to discuss implementation. There was agreement that we should shape likely leaks in the best light for HRC and supplement with bits of policy that show her focused on helping the MC. I'd like to just move forward in that strategy. Is there a draft of the memo we can see?

On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:58 PM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com<mailto:gruncom@aol.com>> wrote:
Sure

Mandy Grunwald
Grunwald Communications
202 973-9400<tel:202%20973-9400>

On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:48 PM, Huma Abedin <huma@hrcoffice.com<mailto:huma@hrcoffice.com>> wrote:
Can people do 9pm or 10pm tonight?

From: John Anzalone [mailto:john@algpolling.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:46 PM
To: Mandy Grunwald
Cc: Huma Abedin; Robby Mook; Dan Schwerin; Joel Benenson; John Pedosta; Nick Merrill; Philippe Reines; Jim Margolis
Subject: Re: Follow-up Media call

tonight or tomorrow during the day would be better. We have NH focus groups to watch tomorrow night.

John Anzalone
Anzalone Liszt Grove Research
334-387-3121<tel:334-387-3121>

PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: john@ALGpolling.com<mailto:john@ALGpolling.com>
www.ALGpolling.comhttp://www.ALGpolling.com

twitter: @AnzaloneLiszt

On Jan 13, 2015, at 6:40 PM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com<mailto:gruncom@aol.com>> wrote:
Should we do a call tonight?

Calls will be heavy tomorrow, I imagine.

Mandy Grunwald
Grunwald Communications
202 973-9400<tel:202%20973-9400>

On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:38 PM, Huma Abedin <huma@hrcoffice.com<mailto:huma@hrcoffice.com>> wrote:
Can we re-group on our internal plan for dealing with the media particularly given the stories today?
I know Philippe and Nick have a draft memo in the works but all of us getting on the same page would be helpful.
Robby, could we get on a call tomorrow evening perhaps?

<Story_Memo.docx>

Download entire raw dataset for all published Pedosta Emails here

Top

Code: Select all

WL Research Community - user contributed research based on documents published by WikiLeaks.

Tor is an encrypted anonymising network that makes it harder to intercept internet communications, or see where communications are coming from or going to.

Tails is a live operating system, that you can start on almost any computer from a DVD, USB stick, or SD card. It aims at preserving your privacy and anonymity.

The Courage Foundation is an international organisation that supports those who risk life or liberty to make significant contributions to the historical record.

Bitcoin uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority or banks; managing transactions and the issuing of bitcoins is carried out collectively by the network.

Facebook Twitter


Image Image Image [P]HARMA

User avatar
Storm
Site Admin
Posts: 1815
Joined: Mar 6th, '18, 23:36
Location: Pioneer Freedom
Contact:

Unread post by Storm »



Image Image Image [P]HARMA

User avatar
Storm
Site Admin
Posts: 1815
Joined: Mar 6th, '18, 23:36
Location: Pioneer Freedom
Contact:

Unread post by Storm »



Image Image Image [P]HARMA

User avatar
JLS1125
Posts: 33
Joined: Oct 5th, '18, 03:53
Location: Alabama
Contact:

Unread post by JLS1125 »

Sexual Abuse of Minors by Clergy in Catholic & Protestant Churches (Research Study: 1950-2010):
https://anonfile.com/keK3m5xebf/Sexual- ... 0-2010_pdf



User avatar
Storm
Site Admin
Posts: 1815
Joined: Mar 6th, '18, 23:36
Location: Pioneer Freedom
Contact:

Unread post by Storm »



Image Image Image [P]HARMA

User avatar
Herb GuitarLik jr
Posts: 471
Joined: Feb 4th, '19, 01:01
Contact:

Unread post by Herb GuitarLik jr »

s



Herb Guitarlik jr and the Al Gore Rhythm BANNED :mrgreen:

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Pedophilia Crime Ring”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 2 guests